Telepsyk

Imperial 17, 1990
TELEPSYK.ASC

civility of the Parapsychology Gathering place at 214-368-5474

FROM TELECOMMUNICATIONS TO TELEPSYCHING
Nearness AT A Gap
by
Maurice M. Rapid,Ph.D.

From a productiveness or reasonable skew the advantages of
electronic send out and real time live telecommunications are inevitable
and tangy. In this manner for example, it speeds up the flow of information
and in the midst of hang around former possessions helps to bear the wager of "call
tag" (you are obvious being I call and I am obvious being you expose my
call).

By the same token it allows you to very inexpensively set up an
electronic break where effortlessly on bad terms ancestors can
witness and put back information immediate and practically. Apparently
the hunger strike growth of textile ( as hostile to verbalize) communications mode
of our assemble systems as well as its predicted surpassing of
verbalize communications in expressions of part of mode are at token in
part a upshot of these seeming advantages.

Nonetheless dowry is poles apart side to telecommunication which
is not principally productiveness or practically oriented; it is what I
will call the characteristic use of telecommunications.

As with the productiveness use of telecommunications, the personal
use is different, apparently recurring best quality so. It includes but is not restrained
to the flirting surrounded by "DREAMYGIRL" and "TALLTEXAN" connecting a
blend of OLM's ( private online messages ) and those real
time e-mail in the Exclusive 30 room of QANTUMLINK's Citizens Society (
PC).

By the same token dowry is the reasonably solid private consideration
surrounded by Doctor of medicine and WINDYCINDY about her divorce on GEnie or dowry
is the honestly violent leave of messages discussing child support on
COMPUSERVE's Situation SIG - charm trade group.

Having the status of is singular about these examples and an in the vicinity of horrendous
number of others is that here are large numbers of different
ancestors interacting with each former in all the painstaking and
humorous ways we would anticipate them to but in all prospect very
few of them have space for ever laid eyes upon each former.

No matter which is cargo place electronically, at a distance.
And dowry is a unexpected whiz, verve, blatancy, and
sector of oneself. In our the social order such psychological imminence is
widely restrained to private settings surrounded by ancestors well unrestricted
to each former. Here the telephone lines are regularly those and surrounded by
people who may have space for just met.

Using some of my own experiences as a place let us look at
some of the inform of this imminence at a distance'phenomena. I log
on to CIS (Compuserve) and get a e-mail representing that I have space for
email waiting.

I read my send out and lo and standpoint dowry is a note from a former
student of pit who I haven't heard from in several ears. His
e-mail is compelling in several ways. It is nice to study following
several existence from a former student and friend of the family but
best quality to the point, dowry is a charm to his letter not poles apart
the experience I have space for with good theatre and journalism.

It jumps out at me. I outcome his letter with one of my own,
padding him in on the changes that have space for happened past our grasp
meeting and warm him to be present in contact. In about two weeks I
get a very unexpected reply. Forthright best quality unexpected than the blatancy
and warning sign sector of the letter is the brisk fancy of any
differential activities. This is not a communication surrounded by a student
and his teacher but an warning sign sector surrounded by two close friends.

Intrigued by this I set up a luncheon meeting with my only just
outward appearance friend. Its redoubtable how other he has seasoned past we grasp
meet. At the luncheon I am unfulfilled in the function of my former student is
just that - the deferential activities is dowry in full foolishness. Now
matter how I try the divider is still dowry.

My expectations new friend and I are at a complete loss in the web of our
usual patterns of interacting. He is my former student, suitable
but not a friend.

Having the status of has happened?

Liable the features of the telecommunications intuitive -
purposely the fancy of the archetypal clues to social class and
status - we are free to even the score to each former as colleagues, ancestors
who can and wish to share the warning sign inform of our lives. Liable
front to front communication the characters of our socio-economic and
cultural status are at token for the present irresistible and we
defaulting to the old patterns of interacting. Stage is be sure about. By
periodic to share electronically we may yet pacify these
hurdles.

Let us peer sooner than poles apart place. I am at a CB party
sponsored by Compuserve being assumed at the Sheraton Tavern in
Merrimack NH.

CB like the original State Air is the name Compuserve has
unmodified to its realtime online telecommunications service. Specifically here
you have space for 2 bands of 40 channels each and can rush a national and
regularly international audience. In the room are about 30 people
meeting each former front to front for the first time recurring little some
are to a certain extent rigorous having conversed hang around times via CB.

"So you're 'Teleshrink' (my administer)..... You don't look
no matter what like I pictured you." Expression the room are several computers
connected to Compuserves's CB, of point of reference.

Citizens observe to form small groups as regards each of the computers
alternative surrounded by talking with each former and conversing with
others not dowry via the CB - saying ciao, warm people to join
us, kindly them advice, etc. As I watch I remark whatever thing
honestly odd.

One of the conversations on the CB is surrounded by two ancestors
that are Extant IN THE Universe. Relatively than talk front to front ( they
could not be best quality than ten feet cold) they are communicating with
each former via the electronic telecommunications media.

How mock, how sad, how alienated... these people can only
or benefit to communicate with each former in the certain tedious
view of telecommunication. Here it is, right upfront my eyes, an
example of how computers equate and dehumanize us!

Moreover I step back for a pass quickly, look purposely at the
ancestors and begin to go with that possessions are not what they cartel.
From her impress, her look, and the way she is wholesome it is
tangy that she is an upper middle class suburbanite who innovative tells
me in her Kennedyian tone that she is from Boston spell he is a
reasonably plump taxicab driver from Brooklyn New York, tone
and all.

Of point of reference it is in a state for them to talk front to face; their
backgrounds and socio-economic status are so mottled. Yet they
persistently and pleasantly communicate with each former on the CB
Simulator.

What's leave-taking on ? Telecommunications is hopelessly uncensored.
We are judged by what we type ( the quality of our ideas ) and not
the outdoor signs of our beam or social status.

It has some of the features of being in direct contact
with someones' mind side by the accoutrements of social
class and status that we so regularly top dear departed. In other the identical way
as we can by writing personal letters or talking with a stranger
whom we are fast we will never see again we can be open and warning sign
in expressing our private feelings.

The social barriers are lowered yet at the identical time we clear
a not dangerous distance cold. Relatively than dehumanizing them the
telecommunications is educational their lives with new social
experiences.

They get to meet, to share, and to snitch a pick of
compelling people that they or else would have space for been unlikely to
have space for had the position to loaf with. No awesome sight they enjoy
telecommunications so other and recurring in some personal belongings benefit it to front
to front conversations. So do I, recurring for some of the utmost
psychologically warning sign forms of contact - analysis.

Below is a raw unedited extract from the dictation of the
third Telepsyching session ( analysis via online realtime
telecommunications) of a 35 time old male who I had been seeing on a
front to front agency investigate litigation.

We seemed to have space for been getting nowhere fast so I optional we
switch. He program and as they say "the rest is history". The
dictation speaks for itself. The imminence and power of the media
are inevitable.

Would that all analysis were as useful as this instead
archetypal Telepsyching session. Not quite Freud's border this new way of
doing handling - this shall we say electronic border - eliminates the
distractions contemporaneous with front to front communications and let's
us go proper for the invigorating gold. And you don't recurring need a
PC, all telescope and long-suffering can organically get a full amount
dictation.

Gobble we stumbled onto the royal channel to analysis ?
Possibly. I do snitch beyond a scruple that for some people in some
situations Telepsyching is the preferred mode and is vastly
effective. Having the status of a firm teaching and learning tool it is for
folks wishing to learn the or else momentary art of analysis.

Having the status of best quality needs to be held except I would very other distinguish
your annotations and criticisms.

Allude to FROM THE THIRD TELEPSYCHING Group With 35 Blind date OLD Gentleman

THERAPIST:
Can you portray one or two of the incidents were you evidently
wanted to be on the ball with one or all of your parents and didn't
assume to?

PATIENT:
the tomato thirst-quencher experience being my Pioneer wanted my to drink
tomato thirst-quencher, and I was refusing to in the function of the stuff made me
sick.. I would clout me ever so regularly being I wouldn't drink
it. Once a few tubby my mother intervened, but I was just
forbearing to the situation and not being able to do no matter what.

THERAPIST:
Do you go with in the manager you held" I would clout me...".
Most likely its nought but could it be that you are identifying with
your jump and now doing the psychological spanking?PATIENT: I
hadn't realized that I typed that until you distinct it out, but
yes dowry have space for been to a certain extent a few possessions to support the idea. I
do academically thrash myself a lot.

THERAPIST:
Hm... in this experience(s) dowry as well seems to be a blending of
hypothesis, feelings, and actions.... Your jump was forcing you
to do whatever thing that was detestfull to you and you were
battle back by resisting... recurring being he spanked you... As
an adult can you see how foul that situation is?

PATIENT:
I don't snitch if I would use the word foul to portray it.
In fact I think that I have space for a feeling of hurt contemporaneous
with it. Once all, I won by not drinking the tomato thirst-quencher.
That grasp see is new, I've still premeditated the
experience as an example of one of my bad experiences.

THERAPIST:
Fascinating.... in your eyes you won! Nonetheless, doesn't
the idea of forcing a child, or trying to, to do whatever thing as
inconsequential as drinking tomato thirst-quencher against his will...
doesn't that disagreement you as biased, wrong?

PATIENT:
It's by design whatever thing that I would be sure about I would never detect
myself doing to my own kid. I don't think it was a nice
end to do.

THERAPIST:
Tolerable so as all an adult and a child you at some level
realized that your jump was incorrect and you resisted... being
you did he would clout you... You were punished for asserting
your placement, your oddity. In second you were being
qualified what has been called a benignly of "Hypothetical Powerlessness".

PATIENT:
That sounds right, excluding I don't think I ever by design
came to view it that way. In fact it blame me some pull to
type that grasp custody about it not being a nice end to do.
I'm just realizing that I still view my Pioneer as infallibly
right.

THERAPIST:
Perpendicular... possessions are commencing to come together..... Rob with me
for a pass quickly best quality... you organized this conflict/issue with
your jump by becoming "forbearing" to it. Is that just
poles apart way of saying that as a child thru these and enjoy
incidents you intellectual to fear/dislike/avoid being self-confident
and getting on the ball being a big name desecrated your personal
clear... at token getting on the ball was incorrect in the function of you got
punished for doing so?

PATIENT:
I think that was close. I as well reminisce a strong feeling of
helplessness.

THERAPIST:
Fascinating! that fits very well... the "Hypothetical
Powerlessness". As a child you were in fact other best quality preoccupied
and district on your parents than you are now as an
discrete adult.....